Antitrust Lawyer Blog

Commentary on Current Developments

On October 3, the Federal Trade Commission announced its decision to intervene in the formation of United Launch Alliance, L.L.C. (ULA), a proposed joint venture between The Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation. The FTC’s complaint alleges that by combining the only two suppliers of U.S. government medium to heavy (MTH) launch services the joint venture as originally structured would have reduced competition in the markets for MTH launch services and space vehicles.

Commission’s charges, the parties must take the following actions:

(1) ULA must cooperate on equivalent terms with all providers of government space vehicles;

On October 2, the FCC consented to the applications filed in connection with the proposed acquisition of Midwest Wireless Holdings, LLC (“Midwest Wireless”) by ALLTEL Communications, Inc. (“ALLTEL”), subject to certain conditions. ALLTEL provides wireless communications services to approximately 11 million wireless customers in 35 states. Midwest Wireless is a wireless provider with more than 400,000 customers in southern Minnesota, northern and eastern Iowa, and western Wisconsin.

Specifically, the FCC approved with conditions the transfer of control of licenses and authorizations held by Midwest Wireless and its subsidiaries to ALLTEL. These licenses and authorizations include: Cellular licenses, Broadband Personal Communications Service (“PCS”) licenses, Common Carrier Fixed Point-to-Point Microwave licenses, 39 GHz licenses, Local Multipoint Distribution Service licenses, and three international section 214 authorizations. In analyzing ALLTEL’s proposed acquisition of Midwest Wireless, the FCC examined the market for mobile telephony services and concluded that the companies demonstrated that the merger will serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity.

Further, the FCC concluded that the likely public interest benefits of the merger outweigh any potential public interest harms and that competitive harm is unlikely in most mobile telephony markets involved in the proposed transaction. In four Cellular Market Areas, however, the FCC determined that likely competitive harms exceed the likely benefits of the transaction and, in these areas, imposed conditions that will effectively remedy the potential for these particular harms. The conditions imposed with respect to the cellular systems in the markets mirror, in large part, the terms of a settlement agreement between the applicants and the Department of Justice.

On September 28, the DOJ announced that it filed a notice with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss its antitrust complaint challenging the potential acquisition of Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. (PSEG) by Exelon Corp. Exelon formally abandoned its effort to acquire PSEG, and therefore the lawsuit and proposed consent decree were no longer necessary.

Andre P. Barlow

202-589-1838

On September 27, five major cable companies asked the FCC for conditions on AT&T’s merger with BellSouth to ensure that the combined phone giants cannot discriminate against cable’s competing digital-phone service. The cable companies seeking these conditions were Advance/Newhouse Communications, Charter Communications, Cablevision Systems, Cox Communications and Insight Communications.

Each introduced voice over Internet protocol (“VoIP”) to cable subscribers. The cable MSOs said in a letter to the FCC that some of the conditions they want should apply to all cable VoIP providers, meaning cable’s biggest players – Comcast and Time Warner Cable – would benefit without actually having to take a public position at the FCC. AT&T’s takeover of BellSouth would make it by far the dominant local phone company in the United States, with 70 million access lines, prompting the cable companies to call for conditions that would protect new voice entrants’ ability to compete. In March, AT&T announced the $67 billion BellSouth deal, which, if approved, would add nine states from Kentucky to Florida to AT&T’s U.S. footprint. The FCC will vote on the merger on November 3 and the Justice Department approved the merger on October 11.

For more information contact:

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sent letters on September 27, 2006 to 166 advertisers and 77 media outlets warning them that their advertisements targeting Hispanics are potentially deceptive. The ads were spotted during a one-day surf of Spanish-language newspaper, magazine, Internet, radio, and television advertisements by 60 partners around the United States and Latin America, coordinated by the FTC.

On April 19, individuals from across the United States and in five Latin American countries participated in the Hispanic Multi-Media Surf. The participants focused on identifying potentially deceptive ads aimed at Hispanics in three areas: health, credit, and business opportunities.

Of the potentially deceptive ads found by participants during the surf, over half were health-related, and made dubious claims for weight loss products and “disease cures.” The ads claimed treatments and cures for serious diseases, most often diabetes and cancer. More than half of the weight-loss ads contained false “red flag” claims that cannot be supported, according to the FTC. Work-at-home and business opportunity ads with questionable claims represented the second most common type of ads found during the surf. Some advertised get rich quick schemes for at-home craft assembly and envelope stuffing. Many made extravagant earnings claims that the FTC found few, if any, consumers ever achieve. Participants also found credit-related ads offering credit repair and guaranteed credit, among other services.

On September 25, the FCC adopted its Eleventh Annual Report to Congress on the state of competition in the mobile telephone – or Commercial Mobile Radio Services (“CMRS”) – industry. This report examines the conditions prevailing in the CMRS marketplace in 2005.

The FCC concluded that there is effective competition in the CMRS marketplace based on its analysis of various measures of competition, including: the number of competing carriers providing service in an area, market shares, pricing behavior and trends, technological upgrades and product innovations, subscriber growth, usage patterns, churn, and service quality. The report reviews competitive market conditions by grouping indicators of the status of competition into four categories: (1) market structure, (2) carrier conduct, (3) consumer behavior, and (4) market performance.

The report also examines a number of related topics, including urban-rural and international comparisons. The report shows that competition among wireless carriers continues to afford many significant benefits to consumers. Specifically, during 2005, the number of mobile telephone subscribers in the United States rose from 184.7 million to 213 million, increasing the nationwide penetration rate to approximately 71%. The amount of time mobile subscribers spend talking and texting on their mobile phones also increased and the volume of text message traffic grew to 48.7 billion messages in the second half of 2005, nearly double the 24.7 billion messages in the same period of 2004. Revenue per minute, which can be used to measure the per-minute price of mobile telephone service, fell 22% during 2005 from $0.09 in 2004 to $0.07 in 2005.

On September 20, 2006, the federal district court in Chicago ruled for the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) in its case against the marketers of the Q-Ray ionized bracelet following a bench trial earlier this summer. In a decision issued September 8, the court found that advertising by Que Te (Andrew) Park and his companies was false and misleading in representing that the bracelet provides immediate, significant, and/or complete pain relief, and that scientific tests proved that it relieves pain.

The court also found that the defendants deceptively advertised their refund policy. The court also stated that it will impose a permanent injunction to prevent them from engaging in such deceptive conduct in the future.

The FTC filed the case in May 2003, alleging that the defendants misrepresented that the Q-Ray ionized bracelet “provides immediate significant or complete relief from various types of pain, including, but not limited to, musculoskeletal pain, sciatic pain, persistent headaches, sinus problems, tendinitis, or injuries,” and that “tests prove that the Q-Ray bracelet relieves pain.” The FTC also alleged that they falsely represented that defendant QT Inc.’s 30-day satisfaction guarantee permits “consumers to readily obtain a full refund of the purchase price if they return the Q-Ray bracelet within 30 days.”

On September 19, the Senate Commerce Committee unanimously reported on the nomination of FCC Chairman Kevin Martin for a second five-year term. Martin was approved following an off-the-floor markup held after the first vote on the Senate floor. According to Commerce Committee spokesman Joe Brenckle, the only senator to miss the 21-0 vote was Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona). Martin now awaits consideration by the full Senate.
For more information contact:

Olev Jaakson at ojaakson@dbmlawgroup.com.

The FCC’s first auction of Advanced Wireless Service (“AWS”) spectrum licenses ended on September 18. A total of 1,122 licenses were offered in the auction, and 104 bidders won 1,087 licenses. The AWS licenses can be used to provide any of a wide array of innovative wireless services and technologies, including voice, data, video, and other wireless broadband services offered over Third Generation (“3G”) mobile networks.

The licenses offered in the auction encompassed a range of geographic area and megahertz sizes in order to accommodate the varying spectrum needs of different types of wireless providers, including those serving rural areas. Auction No. 66 began on August 9, 2006, and closed after 161 rounds of bidding, raising total gross bids of nearly $13.9 billion. The top five winning bidders based on the net amount of their winning bids include: T-Mobile License LLC; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; SpectrumCo LLC; MetroPCS AWS, LLC; and Cingular AWS, LLC.

More than half of the winning bidders in the auction certified their qualifications as small business entities, enabling them to use bidding credits. The unsold licenses remain held by the FCC and will be made available again in a future auction. In a separate press release, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin described the auction as “the biggest, most successful wireless auction in the Commission’s history.”

On September 18, the DOJ announced that it filed a notice with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss its antitrust complaint regarding the potential acquisition of Falconbridge Limited by Inco Limited because Inco has formally abandoned its effort to acquire Falconbridge. The DOJ said that the lawsuit and proposed consent decree are no longer necessary as Falconbridge was instead acquired by Xstrata plc, a Swiss mining company, in August 2006. The DOJ also said that Xstrata’s acquisition of Falconbridge does not pose any competitive problems.

Andre P. Barlow

202-589-1838

Contact Information